COMPARING WEIGHTS AND DISPLACEMENT
We often hear comments that some of our catamaran
designs are heavier than some comparable designs. This is not strictly
correct, and it is unwise to compare designs based on published weights
or length alone. There are two main reasons for this.
1. Comparing apples to oranges. Our cats
are designed for extensive long range live aboard cruising, and as such
are generally higher volume, and more strongly constructed. than some of
their closest competitors. Both of these factors mean heavier materials
weight. However, these differances are not as great as one might think,
because.......
2. There are 3 differant weights which are commonly
quoted as a boats 'displacement'.
(a)
The actual bare weight of the boat, not including operational gear and
equipment'
(b)
The complete vessel weight, not including add on payload. This figure is
frequently quoted as the displacement of the vessel, which is incorrect.
(c)
The actual displacement, which is the amount the boat will weigh when it
is floating on it's designed waterline. This should include the vessel
weight (b) plus one half (1/2) at least, of the maximum add on payload.
Additionally, add on payload should include only
the crew, their gear and supplies, liquids (fuel, water) and any extra
gear that is not part of the operational gear of the vessel. All operational
gear, including
engines etc, galley equipment, matresses, cushions,
ground tackle, batteries, fittings and so on, should be included in vessel
weight (b).
The figures quoted for our designs are always
(b) for vessel weight, and (c) for displacement. Our vessel weights (b)
include all normal operational gear, including the kitchen sink and do
not include payload.
If you do wish to compare boats by weight, make
sure first that they really are compareable, (and not just the same length
overall), and check to see whether the published displacement includes
payload - i.e. is it really the displacement, or is it the vessel weight.
If (b) does it include all operational gear?. If (b) will the
boat float to it's waterline at that weight. (If it does you have a major
problem because the boat will be below its waterline as soon as you carry
yourself and your gear / supplies on board.)
CORAL SEA & CORAL COVE CATS
Q.
Are they a derivative of the Wharram Cats.
A.
No, they are not. The Coral Cats share 3 things in common with Wharram
cats. They are plywood, they have seperate hulls with cross beams, and
in some cases they have flared hull sections derived from the 'V' shape.
That is all, and these characteristics are shared by many designs from
many designers around the world.
While the Coral Cats are similar in the above
respects to the Wharram cats, and may share something of the same basic
concept, they are very differant in most other respects.
The Coral Sea cats have a 'Truncated V'
hull section, which has a narrow flat bottom and sloping sides. Resistance
wise it is marginally more efficient than a straight 'V'. The Coral Cove
Cats have a double chine bottom with sloping sides. This is slightly more
efficient again.
They all have raised coach roofs on each hull
- this allows the accommodation to be raised higher in the hulls for more
accommodation width where it is needed.
They have transom sterns.
They have mini keels or centerboards for optimum
performance. They are more oriented to windward performance.
They also have rigid cross beams to allow stiffer,
more efficient rigs.
They feature centre cockpit modules.
For a given length they have more accomodation.
Q. What are the main differances
between the Coral Sea and Coral Cove Cats.
A. The Coral Sea cats are
simpler than the Coral Cove cats. The Coral Sea cats have a truncated V
hull, while the Coral Coves have a multi chine hull, and generally are
more built in at the bridge deck area. Also the Coral Coves have added
features such as hull pods to allow better internal accommodations etc.
They cost more to build than the Coral Seas (comparatively) but are more
substantial vessels overall.
 |